Publications
Search our bibliography using the filters on the right-hand side.
Displaying 1 through 14 of 14 publications.
Skip to main content
Grivas P, Barata P, Moon H, Gupta S, Hutson T, Sternberg CN, Brown JR, Dave V, Downey C, Shillington AC, Katzenstein HM, Kirker M, Hanson S, Liu FX, Morris V, Bhanegaonkar A, Sonpavde GP. Avelumab first-line maintenance for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: results from the Real-world US PATRIOT-II Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2024 Dec;22(6):102238. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102238
Esterberg E, Iyer S, Nagar SP, Davis KL, Tannir NM. Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2024 Apr;22(2):115-125.e. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.09.009
Bellmunt J, Chang J, Pavilack-Kirker M, Cappelleri JC, Costa N, Esterberg E, Kearney M, Hitchens A, Candrilli SD, Ajmera M. Evaluating real-world characteristics of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma eligible for avelumab maintenance therapy: a multi-country retrospective medical chart review. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2023 Aug;21(4):459-66. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.03.011
Stattin P, Westerberg M, Franck Lissbrant I, Hjalm-Eriksson M, Kjellman A, Ullen A, Vassilev Z, Sandstrom P, Weinrib R, Martinez D, Garcia de Albeniz Martinez X. Real world outcomes in patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with radium-223 in routine clinical practice in Sweden. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022 Sep 9;S1558-7673(22):00194-X. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.09.002
Heidenreich S, Watson V, Ryan M, Phimister E. Decision heuristic or preference? Attribute non-attendance in discrete choice problems. Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):157-71. doi: 10.1002/hec.3524
Tsuchiya A, Watson V. Re-thinking “the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in health". Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26(12):e103-7. doi: 10.1002/hec.3480
Krucien N, Watson V, Ryan M. Is best-worst scaling suitable for health state valuation? A comparison with discrete choice experiments. Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26(12):e1-e16. doi: 10.1002/hec.3459
Watson V, Becker F, de Bekker-Grob E. Discrete choice experiment response rates: a meta-analysis. Health Econ. 2017 Jun;26(6):810-7. doi: 10.1002/hec.3354
Hess G, Borker R, Fonseca E. Treatment patterns: targeted therapies indicated for first-line management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a real-world setting. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2013 Jun;11(2):161-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2012.10.003
Zarkin GA, Cowell AJ, Hicks KA, Mills MJ, Belenko S, Dunlap LJ, Houser KA, Keyes V. Benefits and costs of substance abuse treatment programs for state prison inmates: results from a lifetime simulation model. Health Econ. 2012 Jun;21(6):633-52.
Herring WL, Herrmann JW. The single-day surgery scheduling problem: sequential decision-making and threshold-based heuristics. OR spectrum: quantitative approaches in management. 2012 Apr 1;34(2):429-59.
Ryan M, Watson V. Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. Health Econ. 2009 Apr;18(4):389-401. doi: 10.1002/hec.1364
Ryan M, Watson V, Entwistle V. Rationalising the 'irrational': a think aloud study of discrete choice experiment responses. Health Econ. 2009 Mar;18(3):321-36. doi: 10.1002/hec.1369
Zarkin GA, Dunlap LJ, Hicks KA, Mamo D. Benefits and costs of methadone treatment: results from a lifetime simulation model. Health Econ. 2005 Nov 1;14(11):1133-50.